Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2008, 11:02 PM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,322
Send a message via AIM to porky88
Default Vikings get Jared Allen

Watching Path to the Draft on the NFLN and the bottom line says the Chiefs agree to trade Jared Allen to the Vikings.
__________________
Check out Porky's Sports Blog

http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/porky88
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2008, 12:21 AM
Equipment Manager
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 455
Default

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3362701
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2008, 07:12 AM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,594
Send a message via AIM to cubuffsman78 Send a message via Yahoo to cubuffsman78
Default

I like this trade for both teams. Minnesota finally gets a pass rush, but the price was definitely steep. However, they only traded parts of this year's draft, not next years, which is a plus for the Vikes in my opinion.

KC needed picks. The Chiefs are in rebuilding mode. Now, the debate begins about what they're going to do with those picks.

I still feel like a DE is probable with their first pick. I know there are talks about Albert and Ryan, but the Chiefs have one true DE on the roster now with Hali. Turk McBride takes snaps there, but he's not a threat. Honestly, I think one of KC's third round picks needs to be spent on a DE as well. They have to restock the position. KC has five picks in the first three rounds. Don't be shocked if all five are spent on lineman of the offensive and defensive variety.
__________________
Jonathan Hull
Sports Editor
Fantasy Football Jungle
&
Big Spring Herald
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2008, 12:59 PM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,322
Send a message via AIM to porky88
Default

They need a CB real bad too. KC has a lot of holes so they can go in just about every direction possible.
__________________
Check out Porky's Sports Blog

http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/porky88
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-23-2008, 01:53 PM
Kevman21's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 17,300
Send a message via AIM to Kevman21
Default

I read something yesterday on ESPN, that said that saying what team needs are shouldn't be posted. Every team needs players at every position and every position is a need, besides a punter or kicker. He used the Patriots as an example, and showed how they could draft any position. I think the Chiefs should take the best available player with their first pick. Good trade for the Chiefs though.
__________________

2007 FF Jungle Fantasy Football Champion
2008 FF Jungle Survival Football Champion
2008 FF Jungle Fantasy Football Regular Season Champion
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-23-2008, 02:21 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,594
Send a message via AIM to cubuffsman78 Send a message via Yahoo to cubuffsman78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevman21 View Post
I read something yesterday on ESPN, that said that saying what team needs are shouldn't be posted. Every team needs players at every position and every position is a need, besides a punter or kicker. He used the Patriots as an example, and showed how they could draft any position. I think the Chiefs should take the best available player with their first pick. Good trade for the Chiefs though.
In a perfect situation, that's a great philosophy. You're going to tell me Jacksonville which has Jones-Drew and Fred Taylor need to spend a first round pick on a running back when they're suddenly thin on the DL?

Everyone says they want to take the BPA, but teams rank the BPA based on who they need. I don't think Matt Ryan is on New England's radar at all. He's probably not even on their board. Why should he be? They want to pay a backup QB that much?

Teams do look at needs. To pretend otherwise is naive.
__________________
Jonathan Hull
Sports Editor
Fantasy Football Jungle
&
Big Spring Herald
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-23-2008, 08:09 PM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Posts: 16,686
Send a message via AIM to cdobry1991 Send a message via Yahoo to cdobry1991
Default

Solid trade for both sides. Minnesota gets a dominant pass rusher and Kansas City gets some more picks, including #17. I think that with there 2 first rounders, they'll go DE with Long or Gholston, then at 17 go CB or OL.
__________________
2008 FFJ Pro Football Pick 'Em Champion

What came first, the chicken or the egg?
If you can read this press ALT and F4.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-23-2008, 08:41 PM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 17,257
Default

I'm picturing Long/Gholston at 5, and then Otah/Williams/Albert/Clady at 17. Then a CB like Cason or Reggie Smith in 2nd round
__________________
QB: Peyton Manning (Matt Schaub)
RB: Michael Turner, Thomas Jones (Kevin Smith, Knowshon Moreno)
WR: Anquan Boldin, Brandon Marshall, Mike Sims-Walker (Sidney Rice, Pierre Garcon, Malcolm Floyd)
TE: Heath Miller (Brent Celek)
K: Nick Folk (Matt Stover)
DEF: Pittsburgh (Green Bay)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-23-2008, 11:33 PM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,322
Send a message via AIM to porky88
Default

I think KC would jump on Chris long at #5 but I just can't see Al Davis passing on him. I think it's funny that this is the week a report comes out that Davis says he'll pass on Long for Gholston or McFadden. I'm not buying it yet.

If KC can't trade down, they'll reach for an offensive lineman. They're is no guarantee that Otah or Williams fall to 17.

Then at 17 I don't think they'd go with Phillip Merling like some people now think unless his pro day is off the charts next week. Merling isn't that great of a pass rusher in my opinion. Great against the run though at DE. I think they'd take Mike Jenkins, DRC, MeKelvin, or Talib. My guess is Mike Jenkins.

Then at the top of round 2 they have a chance to jump on Lawrence Jackson of USC who should be a 1st round pick in my opinion but for whatever reason he's seems to of dropped.

That's a pretty good start for KC

1A Try and trade down, if not then Clady or Albert is the pick.
1B Mike Jenkins
2A Lawrence Jackson
__________________
Check out Porky's Sports Blog

http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/porky88
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-24-2008, 02:54 AM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,002
Send a message via ICQ to kevmvp
Default

I might be wrong but I thought I heard that the Vikings made Jared Allen then highest paid defensive player in history with $31 million in guruantess.

Vikings are paying a lot for him but they are getting a very good player.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 Forum style by ForumMonkeys.com.

Back to Top

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125