Quote:
Originally Posted by kevmvp
Yeah but nobody is going to use any of those games you mentioned on Peyton Manning because he won them all. QB's never get killed in a winning effort. Its when they lose.
Favre was apart of some big games in the 90s as well as later in his career. However it doesnt really matter if he was in the later part of his career when he was spotty. If you go out there and take the field I dont care about how old you are. Favre was spotty in some big games and some big games he was great. He's a gunslinger thats what you get in most cases.
|
My point was Manning was too. Up to this point in Manning's career, He's loss more big games than Favre has. A lot more.
Manning is 10 years into his career. I'll compare Favre 10 years into his.
Manning lost to San Diego, Pittsburgh, Tennessee, Miami, New York Jets, and New England twice.
Those are all playoff games.
Favre 10 years in.
Dallas three times, Denver, San Francisco,.
That's Favre 10 years into his career. Losing to Troy Aikman, Steve Young, and John Elway.
Compare that to Manning up to right now and try and make the case than Manning should be ahead of Favre if you're using the big game logic. I just don't get it. You really think Manning is going to do any better in the climax of his career? If has to, otherwise when all said and done he won't compare to Favre even in the big games.