Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2005, 07:32 PM
Water Boy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Non-Viking Land
Posts: 40
Default Moss Trade

I can't believe Moss isn't a Viking anymore. I don't like this trade. We have gone from being a team with a feared offense to being one that is above average. Because our defense is below average we're just average, we're now just an average team. Moss really must have really, really teed off some people.

Well, I hope we draft Mike Williams. I don't know if he's worth the seventh pick so maybe we can trade down a few slots and pick up another late round pick.

Does anyone know anything about this Napoleon Harris we got as a linebacker?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-24-2005, 08:07 PM
Water Boy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9
Default

The Vikes are better off looking to Free Agency to fill the WR void. I think that drafting a top LB, S, or a top DT would be the best options.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2005, 04:00 PM
Water Boy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 18
Default

napolean harris was the first round draft pick by the raiders a few years ago. we dont need him hes exactly like ej henderson. they must have saw something in him that i dont. the vikings need to draft Mike williams or bryalon edwards with there 7th overall pick. Another option is trading up for derrick johnson and lookin for mark clayton for a WR.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2005, 06:56 PM
Water Boy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Non-Viking Land
Posts: 40
Default

Harris just can't be any worse than Henderson

I keep reading that Tice really likes Mike Williams. He was highly rated a few years ago.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-27-2005, 07:37 PM
Water Boy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 22
Default

harris henderson and thomas are all essentially the same type of player. from the combine they all looked like dreams big fast and strong the only problem for the vikings is that doesnt always lead to production if two of the three come around this season look for the vikings to have a huge season defensively especially if they pick up another DE or DT in the offseason to give them three weapons on the line (williams and udeze) stats show you win games defensively with a strong front seven and the vikings are very close to pulling that off
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2005, 02:15 AM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfinneman
harris henderson and thomas are all essentially the same type of player. from the combine they all looked like dreams big fast and strong the only problem for the vikings is that doesnt always lead to production if two of the three come around this season look for the vikings to have a huge season defensively especially if they pick up another DE or DT in the offseason to give them three weapons on the line (williams and udeze) stats show you win games defensively with a strong front seven and the vikings are very close to pulling that off
thomas and harris are fast EJ henderson is slow he fell to the second round cause of his poopy 40 time in the draft
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 Forum style by ForumMonkeys.com.

Back to Top

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125