Arrington to Giants?

Johnny09 · #1 04-22-2006, 11:36 AM

agreement in principle for 49 mil over 7 years.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2417903

bdc02 · #2 04-22-2006, 11:41 AM

Yay...the Packers didn't get him.

Johnny09 · #3 04-22-2006, 11:51 AM

I feel similarly regarding the pack, although I think that increases the likelihood they take hawk, who will last longer and has good knees, which is bad. More importantly, I hate the giants.

bdc02 · #4 04-22-2006, 12:01 PM

ya...I think the packers will now take Hawk.

wiscbadgerfootball · #5 04-22-2006, 12:04 PM

dang it, i was hoping the Pack would get him

kevmvp · #6 04-22-2006, 05:26 PM

Arrington is a good player when he is healthy. Its a good signing for the Giants because there biggest weakness last year was at LB. If Arrington stays healthy then he will really help out the Giants defense.

cubuffsman78 · #7 04-22-2006, 05:29 PM

Arrington is overrated. I'm glad the Giants signed him and wasted all of that money.

porky88 · #8 04-22-2006, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cubuffsman78

Arrington is overrated. I'm glad the Giants signed him and wasted all of that money.

Yeah he's not worth that much. There's an uproar starting in Green Bay to why they didn't pay him that kind of money. I would never pay Arrington that kind of money.

To inconsistent and to injury proned let alone the questions about him.

archduke · #9 10-30-2006, 02:49 PM

now arrington is done for the year and we are in a deep hole to this guy.. this sux