Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2007, 03:25 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,321
Send a message via AIM to TNMK
Default Sam Bradford

First and foremost, let me start off by saying he's a freshman.

Does this automatically take him out of the Heisman race? For goodness sake, he has almost indentical numbers to Colt Brennan.

What does everyone else think?
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2007, 08:13 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,594
Send a message via AIM to cubuffsman78 Send a message via Yahoo to cubuffsman78
Default Re: Sam Bradford

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNMK
First and foremost, let me start off by saying he's a freshman.

Does this automatically take him out of the Heisman race? For goodness sake, he has almost indentical numbers to Colt Brennan.

What does everyone else think?
It shouldn't, but yes it does.
__________________
Jonathan Hull
Sports Editor
Fantasy Football Jungle
&
Big Spring Herald
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2007, 01:22 AM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,322
Send a message via AIM to porky88
Default

It's September. If his numbers are on pace with Brennan's in November then you'll hear the hype. 4 games into the season and OU hasn't really played anyone but Miami whom is still kind of an unknown right now.
__________________
Check out Porky's Sports Blog

http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/porky88
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-23-2007, 09:23 AM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,594
Send a message via AIM to cubuffsman78 Send a message via Yahoo to cubuffsman78
Default

It's hard for me to put anyone above McFadden right now anyway. I think it's going to come down to him and DeSean Jackson.

Brennan will lose votes because of the system. Brohm because Louisville is losing to teams that shouldn't come close to them. You can argue it's not his fault, but losing affects quarterbacks Heisman promise more than any other position.
__________________
Jonathan Hull
Sports Editor
Fantasy Football Jungle
&
Big Spring Herald
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-23-2007, 05:50 PM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,322
Send a message via AIM to porky88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cubuffsman78
It's hard for me to put anyone above McFadden right now anyway. I think it's going to come down to him and DeSean Jackson.

Brennan will lose votes because of the system. Brohm because Louisville is losing to teams that shouldn't come close to them. You can argue it's not his fault, but losing affects quarterbacks Heisman promise more than any other position.
McFadden would probably be my #1 but Tim Tebow is right behind him in my opinion.
__________________
Check out Porky's Sports Blog

http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/porky88
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-23-2007, 07:15 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,321
Send a message via AIM to TNMK
Default

There's no way McFadden wins it.

If you say Brohm can't because he's on a losing team, how do you explain McFadden? His team is also losing.

Frankly, it goes to the best player on the nation's best team. As of right now, only Booty and Tebow fit that mold.

I'm just saying though, if Bradford keeps his stats up and Oklahoma doesn't lose, it's hard to count him out.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-24-2007, 01:06 AM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,322
Send a message via AIM to porky88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNMK
There's no way McFadden wins it.

If you say Brohm can't because he's on a losing team, how do you explain McFadden? His team is also losing.

Frankly, it goes to the best player on the nation's best team. As of right now, only Booty and Tebow fit that mold.

I'm just saying though, if Bradford keeps his stats up and Oklahoma doesn't lose, it's hard to count him out.
I definitely agree with you on Bradford. Though I wouldn't give it to him over Tebow. The more I think about it, the more Tebow will debut as the top choice for my Heisman Watch. The guy is playing lights out and he's playing in the SEC.

I disagree that it can't go to a guy on a losing team. While the past history says otherwise, McFadden finished 2nd a year ago and that has to count for something.
__________________
Check out Porky's Sports Blog

http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/porky88
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-24-2007, 08:42 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,594
Send a message via AIM to cubuffsman78 Send a message via Yahoo to cubuffsman78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNMK
There's no way McFadden wins it.

If you say Brohm can't because he's on a losing team, how do you explain McFadden? His team is also losing.
I said Brohm won't because losses are put more heavily on quarterbacks. McFadden isn't taking blame for losses. QBs almost always will. I'm just thinking like a voter.

McFadden is the best player I watch on television every week. The Hogs could be in a 3rd and 14 and I believe they'll get the first down if McFadden gets the ball.
__________________
Jonathan Hull
Sports Editor
Fantasy Football Jungle
&
Big Spring Herald
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-24-2007, 11:10 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,321
Send a message via AIM to TNMK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by porky88
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNMK
There's no way McFadden wins it.

If you say Brohm can't because he's on a losing team, how do you explain McFadden? His team is also losing.

Frankly, it goes to the best player on the nation's best team. As of right now, only Booty and Tebow fit that mold.

I'm just saying though, if Bradford keeps his stats up and Oklahoma doesn't lose, it's hard to count him out.
I definitely agree with you on Bradford. Though I wouldn't give it to him over Tebow. The more I think about it, the more Tebow will debut as the top choice for my Heisman Watch. The guy is playing lights out and he's playing in the SEC.

I disagree that it can't go to a guy on a losing team. While the past history says otherwise, McFadden finished 2nd a year ago and that has to count for something.
I said Tebow is the top choice.

I stated the only players that dfit the 'best player on best team' mold is Booty or Tebow right now.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-24-2007, 11:11 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,321
Send a message via AIM to TNMK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cubuffsman78
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNMK
There's no way McFadden wins it.

If you say Brohm can't because he's on a losing team, how do you explain McFadden? His team is also losing.
I said Brohm won't because losses are put more heavily on quarterbacks. McFadden isn't taking blame for losses. QBs almost always will. I'm just thinking like a voter.

McFadden is the best player I watch on television every week. The Hogs could be in a 3rd and 14 and I believe they'll get the first down if McFadden gets the ball.
Just remember Larry Fitzgerald. Great player, subpar team, no Heisman.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 Forum style by ForumMonkeys.com.

Back to Top

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125