Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:36 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,321
Send a message via AIM to TNMK
Default Pat Kirwan mock

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/10069968
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:40 PM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 17,380
Default

The Tampa-Detroit trade makes no sense. They could both stay where they are and get the same players.

And he doesnt have the houston-atlanta trade in there

I'm not really a fan of the mock as a whole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:42 PM
Practice Squad
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 501
Send a message via AIM to Kinsm Send a message via Yahoo to Kinsm
Default Re: Pat Kirwan mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNMK
http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/10069968
Cubby....I like the comment about Staley for the Bears.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:49 PM
Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 2,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYJets30
I'm not really a fan of the mock as a whole

Agreed

I hope its not D-Rev at 13
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:53 PM
black19's Avatar
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yay Area 707
Posts: 4,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYJets30
The Tampa-Detroit trade makes no sense. They could both stay where they are and get the same players.

And he doesnt have the houston-atlanta trade in there

I'm not really a fan of the mock as a whole
Not true. After Johnson's pro day numbers, there is no gaurantee that he's available at #4. Many teams could be eyeing to move up to grab Johnson. This draft assumes Tampa takes control of the situation. Hell, there isn't even a sure fire chance Johnson is available at #2 anymore.

I'm a huge fan of Kirwan's knowledge of the game both business aspect and the onfield aspect, but this mock is not my favorite. He's done better. Granted, this mock assumes trades, which is damn near impossible to figure out without getting inside the brain trust of each individual team and need. Because of this, the mock definitely skews it away from the same 3-4 mocks we've been seeing lately.
__________________
The Line Below Is True
The Line Above Is False
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-22-2007, 12:02 AM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 17,380
Default

The onyl team that would really trade up to get johnson is Minnesota.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-22-2007, 07:06 AM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,678
Send a message via AIM to cubuffsman78 Send a message via Yahoo to cubuffsman78
Default

Revis as the #1 CB? So Kirwan is one of those guys that's obsessed with measurables too....that mock is not very good at all. And it's not just cause of the Revis pick. He's way off on that Staley comment too. Staley does not fit their blocking scheme. I like to think that OL is my position of...I don't wanna say expertise, but I know the position better than others. Staley isn't a good fit for a power blocking scheme. Also, the Cowboys pick....Michael Griffin? A) I don't like him in the 1st round at all. B) Weren't the Cowboys bad enough in coverage at the safety position last season? Why would they add a guy that should play SS, not FS, and is worse in coverage than Roy Williams is? I really don't think Kirwan is very much in touch with a lot of teams at all.
__________________
Jonathan Hull
Editor
Fantasy Football Jungle
&
2009 KING OF THE JUNGLE
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-22-2007, 02:07 PM
Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 2,238
Send a message via MSN to Saint33 Send a message via Yahoo to Saint33
Default

I was actually going to post this the other day, but didn't get around to it

this mock SUCKS!!!! None of the trades make very much sense, Revis that high is a joke, and Hall that low is a joke. So revis runs a 4.39, that's worse than Hall's 40 and he is worse overall at everything on the field than hall is.

I don't see why the Saints would trade up to get Olsen when they signed Eric Johnson in FA, and allready have Billy Miller, who was surprisingly good for them last season.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-22-2007, 02:19 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,678
Send a message via AIM to cubuffsman78 Send a message via Yahoo to cubuffsman78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saint33

I don't see why the Saints would trade up to get Olsen when they signed Eric Johnson in FA, and allready have Billy Miller, who was surprisingly good for them last season.
Eric Johnson is a huge injury risk and Billy Miller wasn't good for the Saints last season. He only caught 14 balls and not TDs. I expect them to stand pat with Johnson, but he'll be paired with Mark Campbell. They're very excited about his potential at TE.
__________________
Jonathan Hull
Editor
Fantasy Football Jungle
&
2009 KING OF THE JUNGLE
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-22-2007, 02:36 PM
Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 2,238
Send a message via MSN to Saint33 Send a message via Yahoo to Saint33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cubuffsman78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saint33

I don't see why the Saints would trade up to get Olsen when they signed Eric Johnson in FA, and allready have Billy Miller, who was surprisingly good for them last season.
Eric Johnson is a huge injury risk and Billy Miller wasn't good for the Saints last season. He only caught 14 balls and not TDs. I expect them to stand pat with Johnson, but he'll be paired with Mark Campbell. They're very excited about his potential at TE.
Miller didn't do much in the season, but came on in the playoffs. Brees went to him a number of times, and used him as a safety net. Eric Johnson is an injury risk, i agree, but i still don't see why the Saints would trade up to get Olsen. If he fell to them, its possible, but they would not move up to grab him.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 Forum style by ForumMonkeys.com.

Back to Top

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125