Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2007, 03:16 PM
Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 2,205
Send a message via MSN to Saint33 Send a message via Yahoo to Saint33
Default Packers take Harrell

Hey, im happy to see this one. The packers reached very hard on him, they could have had a much better DT in Alan Branch. I like Harrell but his value is no where near #16. This pick makes me happy as a Vikings fan.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2007, 03:33 PM
Equipment Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 228
Default

I agree they could have gotten him lower but he is a very good DT and probably would have gone in the 20's anyway so it's not a bad pick.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2007, 03:34 PM
michael's Avatar
Special Teams Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,871
Default

I actually like this pick for the Packers. I like Harrell better than Branch. If Harrell wasn't hurt this year he would've been picked a lot higher.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2007, 03:38 PM
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,594
Send a message via AIM to cubuffsman78 Send a message via Yahoo to cubuffsman78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michael
I actually like this pick for the Packers. I like Harrell better than Branch. If Harrell wasn't hurt this year he would've been picked a lot higher.
You hit the nail on the head. I know everyone is saying the he would've been taken higher, but he was incredible before the injury. He dominated in the Cal game before he got hurt. I think this pick could turn out very well for the Pack. I am surprised that teams did have him graded this highly though.
__________________
Jonathan Hull
Sports Editor
Fantasy Football Jungle
&
Big Spring Herald
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2007, 06:25 PM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,322
Send a message via AIM to porky88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cubuffsman78
Quote:
Originally Posted by michael
I actually like this pick for the Packers. I like Harrell better than Branch. If Harrell wasn't hurt this year he would've been picked a lot higher.
You hit the nail on the head. I know everyone is saying the he would've been taken higher, but he was incredible before the injury. He dominated in the Cal game before he got hurt. I think this pick could turn out very well for the Pack. I am surprised that teams did have him graded this highly though.
I would of preferred a trade down but again I echo what you and Michael said. Had he stayed healthy he would've probably went in the top 20 of the Draft.
__________________
Check out Porky's Sports Blog

http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/porky88
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:11 AM
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 17,257
Default

I was a little surprised, I expected Olsen since Ginn and Lynch were gone
__________________
QB: Peyton Manning (Matt Schaub)
RB: Michael Turner, Thomas Jones (Kevin Smith, Knowshon Moreno)
WR: Anquan Boldin, Brandon Marshall, Mike Sims-Walker (Sidney Rice, Pierre Garcon, Malcolm Floyd)
TE: Heath Miller (Brent Celek)
K: Nick Folk (Matt Stover)
DEF: Pittsburgh (Green Bay)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 Forum style by ForumMonkeys.com.

Back to Top

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125